In a story concerning a previously reported Illinois bill SB 0651 addressing the retail energy markets, including generally prohibiting service to assistance program customers and instituting various new marketing regulations and contracting prohibitions, The Chicago Reporter reports that a customer who spent a decade with a retail supplier says they paid $20,000 more than if they had been on default service.

For more details concerning SB 0651, see EnergyChoiceMatters.com's exclusive analysis of its provisions here

The Chicago Reporter's story also includes various other customer recitals of experiences with retail suppliers, including allegations of forged signatures on contracts (see the story here)

Tags:
Illinois   Sales & Marketing  

Comment on this story


ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com
Energy-Regulatory-Specialist -- Other -- Other
More Stories on RetailEnergyX.com:
Former Pa. PUC Chair Cawley Recommends Banning, Or 'Reducing' Reliance On, Door-to-Door Sales
Illinois PIRG Recommends Forcing Exelon To Divest From ComEd, Requiring ComEd TOU Supply Rates
Settlement In Lawsuit Against Retail Supplier Nears Approval; PUC Case Continues
Report Names "Most Trusted REP Brands" In Texas
Federal Court Rules Pennsylvania Business Closure, Stay At Home Orders Are Unconstitutional