Parties yesterday submitted testimony in AEP Ohio's electric security plan proceeding regarding default service and other retail market issues.

We did not see any surprises in the testimony.

Purchase of receivables, proposed by AEP Ohio in its application, found little support outside of retail suppliers, with the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and industrial customers opposing POR outright or proposing significant changes (such as a non-zero discount rate).

AEP Ohio's sought nonbypassable PPA rider for its OVEC entitlements also found little support, as various load interests saw the charge as above-market.

Click here to read parties' testimony

Tags:
Ohio   AEP Ohio   POR  

Comment on this story


ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com
TPV-SALES-EXECUTIVE -- Back Office Provider -- Other
Sr-Market-Risk-Analyst -- Wholesale Supplier/Trader -- New York - New York City Metro
Energy-Regulatory-Specialist -- Other -- Other
More Stories on RetailEnergyX.com:
City Officials Allege Mailings Linked To FirstEnergy Sought To Erode Residents' Confidence In Muni
Report: FBI Searches Home Of Ohio PUC Chairman
PUCO Orders New Audit Of FirstEnergy Utilities' Compliance With Corporate Separation Regulations
Report: Energy Harbor Subpoenaed In Federal Probe Of Ohio Nuclear Subsidy Law
Updated: PUCO Directs FirstEnergy EDCs To Show Cause HB6 Political Spending Not Included In Rates