Readers could have seen your ad here when reading this story. Email retailenergyx@gmail.com
       Events        Jobs        Contact        Migration Stats        Supplier Lists        Municipal Aggregation

RESA Notes Disparate Language Regarding New York Enrollment Verifications in UBPs

June 14,2018



In comments in support of a rehearing request seeking changes to the recently revised Uniform Business Practices in New York, the Retail Energy Supply Association noted, as EnergyChoiceMatters.com had done in reporting on the changes when first proposed (see story here), that the UBPs contain disparate language regarding the verification of enrollments

RESA noted that the UBP amendments provide that, "In addition to the requirements in UBP Section 5.B.1., for any sale to a residential and small nonresidential customer resulting from: 1) door-to-door solicitation; 2) telephonic marketing; or 3) scheduled appointment, each enrollment is only valid with an independent third party verification."

However, RESA noted that the term "voice-recorded verification" is used in other parts of the UBP, rather than "independent third party verification"

"[T]he use of the phrase 'independent third party verification' in some instances in the UBP and the use of the phrase 'voice-recorded verification' in other instances in the UBP has the potential to create confusion because it is not clear if the two words are intended to have the same or different meanings. According to Section 5, Attachment 1, a 'voice-recorded verification is required to enter into a telephonic agreement, or a door to door agreement, or agreement that resulted from an appointment with a residential and small nonresidential customer to initiate service and begin enrollment.' Further, '[u]se of either an Independent Third Party or an Integrated Voice Response system to obtain customer authorization is required for any telephone solicitation or sales resulting from door-to-door marketing or appointment.' However, in other sections of the UBP, there is only a reference to 'an independent third party verification.' Thus, it is unclear whether the use of an Independent Third Party and IVR are both acceptable methods of obtaining verification in all instances. Accordingly, RESA requests that the Commission clarify this issue by modifying the UBP to use consistent terminology throughout," RESA said

RESA's comments also addressed other issues previously raised by ESCOs concerning the UBP changes throughout the proceeding. See RESA's comments here

Tags:
New York  

Comment on this story


ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com
Executive Director -- Retail Supplier
Director/Manager Channel Sales -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
Director of Billing Operations
Analyst, Supply/Settlements -- Retail Supplier -- Houston
Manager of Supply -- Retail Provider -- Dallas


More Stories on RetailEnergyX.com:
MI, IPPNY Seek To Avoid "Double Payments" To Some Resources Under NY Carbon Pricing
New York Utilities File Model Tariff For Hybrid Storage, DG System
NY Adopts Environmental Impact Statement For Offshore Wind Procurement
RESA Notes Disparate Language Regarding New York Enrollment Verifications in UBPs
New York Working Group Files EDI Changes


comments powered by Disqus





Advertise here:
Email retailenergyx@gmail.com


Events Jobs Contact Migration Stats Supplier Lists Municipal Aggregation

About Disclaimer Privacy Terms of Service

Home


Developed by: Avidweb Technologies inc.