Events        Jobs        Contact        Migration Stats        Supplier Lists        Municipal Aggregation
NJ BPU Takes FERC To Court Over PJM Capacity Performance Approval

August 01,2016



The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities last week ratified the filing of a Notice of Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which challenges the decision of a divided Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to deny rehearing of PJM’s Capacity Performance construct.

FERC denied rehearing by a 2-1 vote, with Chairman Bay dissenting.

A year ago, a divided FERC first approved PJM’s Capacity Performance construct. The initial approval also included a noteworthy dissent from Chairman Bay, the BPU said

"FERC has not examined whether approving the Capacity Performance construct makes financial sense for consumers," said Richard S. Mroz, President, New Jersey Board of Public Utilities.

In filing the appeal, the Board is joined by the American Public Power Association, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and the Public Power Association of New Jersey.

In its denied request for rehearing, the BPU contended that FERC’s approval of the Capacity Performance construct was arbitrary and capricious. The Board’s challenge was based, in part, on FERC’s failure to adequately consider the costs and benefits associated with the construct and on a flawed penalty mechanism.

Tags:
PJM   Capacity Market   New Jersey   New Jersey BPU   Capacity Performance  

Comment on this story


ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com
TPV-SALES-EXECUTIVE -- Back Office Provider -- Other
Sr-Market-Risk-Analyst -- Wholesale Supplier/Trader -- New York - New York City Metro
Head-of-Retail-Operations -- Wholesale Supplier/Trader -- Other
Energy-Regulatory-Specialist -- Other -- Other
More Stories on RetailEnergyX.com:
FERC Orders $230 Million In Penalties Against GreenHat, Related Parties '
SPP, MISO Institute Rotating Outages, Showing ERCOT 'Energy-Only' Market Design Not Cause Of Outages
FERC Rules That Entering Bilateral FTR Data Into PJM System Does Not Create A Separate Contract
Shell Seeks FERC Relief From Claim Entering Bilateral FTR Data Into PJM Creates Separate Contract
PJM Trying To Cobble Together Exemption For SOS Contracts From MOPR, After FERC MOPR Order


comments powered by Disqus





Advertise here:
Email retailenergyx@gmail.com


Events Jobs Contact Migration Stats Supplier Lists Municipal Aggregation

About Disclaimer Privacy Terms of Service

Home


Developed by: Avidweb Technologies inc.