In explaining the District of Columbia PSC's decision to deny the merger of Exelon and Pepco, Chairman Betty Ann Kane stated, "The public policy of the District is that the local electric company should focus solely on providing safe, reliable and affordable distribution service to District residences, businesses and institutions." [emphasis added]

Do you think the PSC is fulfilling this goal, or moving towards it?

Is Pepco's current role in the District, which includes acting as the default supplier, merely focused on providing safe, reliable and affordable distribution service?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments

Tags:
Default Service   Pepco   District of Columbia  

Comment on this story


ADVERTISEMENT
NEW Jobs on RetailEnergyJobs.com
TPV-SALES-EXECUTIVE -- Back Office Provider -- Other
Sr-Market-Risk-Analyst -- Wholesale Supplier/Trader -- New York - New York City Metro
Energy-Regulatory-Specialist -- Other -- Other
More Stories on RetailEnergyX.com:
Illinois PIRG Recommends Forcing Exelon To Divest From ComEd, Requiring ComEd TOU Supply Rates
DPU Approves Cost Recovery, Disposition Of Products In Approving Utilities' Offshore Wind Contracts
OCC: Customers On Retail Supply Paid $5 Million More Than Default Service In July
FirstEnergy Ohio Residential Default Service Prices Fall; Reminder Of New IL Prices
Duke Energy Ohio Notes Lower Electric Default Service Rates Effective June 1